From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261894AbVF0HrD (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:47:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261893AbVF0HrC (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:47:02 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:19139 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261896AbVF0Hqw (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:46:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:46:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [rfc] lockless pagecache Message-Id: <20050627004624.53f0415e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <42BF9CD1.2030102@yahoo.com.au> References: <42BF9CD1.2030102@yahoo.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > > First I'll put up some numbers to get you interested - of a 64-way Altix > with 64 processes each read-faulting in their own 512MB part of a 32GB > file that is preloaded in pagecache (with the proper NUMA memory > allocation). I bet you can get a 5x to 10x reduction in ->tree_lock traffic by doing 16-page faultahead.