From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262009AbVF1I1J (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:27:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261911AbVF1IPZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:15:25 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:51652 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261860AbVF1IJz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:09:55 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:41:45 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kyle Moffett Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ndevfs - a "nano" devfs Message-ID: <20050628074145.GC3577@kroah.com> References: <20050624081808.GA26174@kroah.com> <9EE4350F-5791-4787-950B-14E5C2B9ADB8@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9EE4350F-5791-4787-950B-14E5C2B9ADB8@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:57:55PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote: > One of the things that most annoys me about udev is that I still need > a minimal static dev in order for the system to boot. Why? You should not. Works just fine for me here :) I suggest you work on your init scripts some more... greg k-h