From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262320AbVF3BKZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:10:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262332AbVF3BKZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:10:25 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:53778 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262320AbVF3BKR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:10:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 03:10:15 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [-mm patch] CONFIGFS_FS: "If unsure, say N." Message-ID: <20050630011015.GC27478@stusta.de> References: <20050624080315.GC26545@stusta.de> <20050629213038.GA23823@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050630004738.GA27478@stusta.de> <20050630005723.GE23823@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050630005723.GE23823@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:47:38AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > But I get your point, what about the patch below? > > Non-descriptive. We are descriptive for sysfs (and even allow > the choice!). I'd say that leaving the description but perhaps adding > the caveat about modules and unsure-N might be a good way to go. The question is: Assume a user doesn't use external modules, will enabling this option have any effect for him except that it wastes some bytes of his RAM? sysfs is useful in this case. How is configfs useful in this case? > Joel cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed