From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262909AbVF3IeK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:34:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262917AbVF3IeK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:34:10 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35480 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262909AbVF3IeH (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:34:07 -0400 From: Gernot Payer To: Roland McGrath Subject: Re: Patch to disarm timers after an exec syscall Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:34:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200506291850.j5TIo72x032190@magilla.sf.frob.com> In-Reply-To: <200506291850.j5TIo72x032190@magilla.sf.frob.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506301034.06372.gpayer@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 29 June 2005 20:50, Roland McGrath wrote: > In the current code, de_thread already calls exit_itimers to address > exactly this issue. Can someone please send me the test case that > demonstrates this is not working right? This test case can be found here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/posixtest/posixtestsuite/conformance/interfaces/timer_create/9-1.c?view=markup But as already mentioned in this thread, this test case is wrong. > Thanks, > Roland mfg Gernot