From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com
Cc: ak@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, andrea@suse.dk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050630161503.GA1627@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A8F92187EF7A249BF847F1BF4903C040240AE4E@ausx2kmpc103.aus.amer.dell.com>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 03:16:51PM -0500, Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com wrote:
> >> set and isn't executable. And, since PAGE_KERNEL (with _PAGE_NX set)
> >> didn't match the original pages attributes, the 512 PTEs weren't
> >> reverted back into a large page. (Also, __change_page_attr() did
> >> *another* get_page() on the page containing these 512 PTEs, so now
> >> the page_count has gone up to 3, instead of going back down to 1 (or
> >> staying at 2).)
> >
> > That should be already fixed.
>
> It doesn't appear to be fixed (in the i386 arch). The
I only fixed it for x86-64 correct. Does it work for you on x86-64?
If yes then the changes could be brought over.
What do you all need this for anyways?
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-30 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-28 20:16 page allocation/attributes question (i386/x86_64 specific) Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-30 16:15 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-20 19:24 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-20 15:06 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-20 20:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-20 14:51 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-20 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-19 21:20 Stuart Hayes
2005-07-19 22:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 17:21 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-05 21:35 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-05 22:00 ` randy_dunlap
2005-07-05 20:02 Stuart_Hayes
2005-07-05 21:27 ` randy_dunlap
2005-07-07 14:33 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-01 20:33 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-30 19:11 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-30 17:14 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-30 16:56 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-30 17:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-29 17:20 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-24 18:20 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-25 2:28 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-22 17:11 Stuart_Hayes
2005-06-22 23:54 ` Rik Van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050630161503.GA1627@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox