From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263011AbVF3Q5b (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:57:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263014AbVF3Q4n (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:56:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:10112 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263011AbVF3Q40 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:56:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:55:57 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kristian Benoit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, bhuey@lnxw.com, andrea@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, karim@opersys.com, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, rpm@xenomai.org Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3 Message-ID: <20050630165557.GA15692@elte.hu> References: <42C320C4.9000302@opersys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42C320C4.9000302@opersys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Kristian Benoit wrote: > "plain" run: > > Measurements | Vanilla | preemp_rt | > ---------------+-------------+----------------+ > fork | 93us | 157us (+69%) | > open/close | 2.3us | 3.7us (+43%) | > execve | 351us | 446us (+27%) | > select 500fd | 12.7us | 25.8us (+103%) | > mmap | 660us | 2867us (+334%) | > pipe | 7.1us | 11.6us (+63%) | update: these tests should perform significantly better on the freshly released -50-37 (or later) PREEMPT_RT kernels. (fork, execve, mmap [*] was improved in -50-36, the others in -50-37) Ingo [*] the extent of the above fork/execve/mmap costs is still unexplained, unless the test was run with HIGHMEM64 and HIGHPTE enabled.