Re: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module

James Morris
2005-07-03T18:54:08Z

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Tony Jones wrote:

> There just isn't enough content to justify a stacker specific filesystem IMHO.

It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM,
to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of
managing its own selinuxfs.

- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@redhat.com>