From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261523AbVGDGtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 02:49:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261525AbVGDGtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 02:49:24 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:26562 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261523AbVGDGtW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 02:49:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:50:56 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Ed Cogburn Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiser4 vs politics: linux misses out again Message-ID: <20050704065056.GE1444@suse.de> References: <1120134372.42c3e4e49e610@webmail.bur.st> <20050630153326.GB24468@voodoo> <20050630160244.GV11013@nysv.org> <20050630180959.GC24468@voodoo> <20050702215645.GB4907@voodoo> <20050704011330.GG4907@voodoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 03 2005, Ed Cogburn wrote: > Jim Crilly wrote: > > > From a user's standpoint, no of course not. But once it's included in the > > mainline it's forced upon the kernel maintainers > > > No it isn't. Its just like any other optional feature. If it stays > unmaintained for too long it just gets removed from the kernel, this > happens all the time. This is another one of those non-issues that isn't > relevent to this discussion but is being used to avoid the real issue. Go Yeah right, you really nailed that one, Ed. You obviously have years of kernel maintenance under your belt. -- Jens Axboe