From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261526AbVGDH6L (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:58:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261460AbVGDH6L (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:58:11 -0400 Received: from cerebus.immunix.com ([198.145.28.33]:13495 "EHLO ermintrude.int.immunix.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261554AbVGDHtQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 03:49:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 00:44:49 -0700 From: Tony Jones To: Kurt Garloff , Linux kernel list , Chris Wright , Stephen Smalley , James Morris , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Steve Beattie , Linux LSM list Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use conditional Message-ID: <20050704074449.GA12963@immunix.com> References: <20050703154405.GE11093@tpkurt.garloff.de> <20050703190007.GA30292@immunix.com> <20050704065902.GO11093@tpkurt.garloff.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050704065902.GO11093@tpkurt.garloff.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:59:02AM +0200, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > The topic of replacing dummy (with capability) was discussed there > > last week, in the context of stacker, but a common solution for both > > cases would be needed. > > Both cases? CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER and !CONFIG_SECURITY_STACKER ;-) http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2005-June/6200.html I was assuming (bad of me I know) that Serge's patch would nail both cases with one stone. Tony