From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [no more]
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:52:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050708085253.GA1177@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57445.195.245.190.94.1120812419.squirrel@www.rncbc.org>
* Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org> wrote:
> OK.
>
> Just for the heads up, here goes todays summary results regarding my
> jack_test4.2 test suite against 2.6.12 kernels configured with
> PREEMPT_RT, but... now with 99.9% certainty :)
thanks for the testing!
> ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
> RT-V0.7.51-13 RT-V0.7.49-01
> ------------------------------ ------------- -------------
> Delay Maximum . . . . . . . . : 333 295 usecs
> Cycle Maximum . . . . . . . . : 970 943 usecs
> Average DSP Load. . . . . . . : 45.7 44.4 %
> Average CPU System Load . . . : 15.6 16.3 %
> Average CPU User Load . . . . : 32.0 30.1 %
i'm wondering - is this slight increase in CPU utilization (and
latencies) due to natural fluctuations, or is it a genuine overhead
increase?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-08 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1119299227.20873.113.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050621105954.GA18765@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1119370868.26957.9.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050621164622.GA30225@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1119375988.28018.44.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <1120256404.22902.46.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
[not found] ` <20050703133738.GB14260@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1120428465.21398.2.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu>
2005-07-07 18:46 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-07 18:53 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [2] Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-07 19:49 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-07 23:19 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 8:46 ` realtime-preempt-2.6.12-final-V0.7.51-11 glitches [no more] Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-07-08 9:40 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-08 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-08 10:53 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 15:12 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-11 22:00 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2005-07-11 22:09 ` Rui Nuno Capela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050708085253.GA1177@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox