Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

David S. Miller
2006-05-22T07:08:45Z

From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200

> So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...

Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
up somehow.