Re: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'

Olaf Hering
2006-05-22T07:11:10Z

On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200
>
> > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...
>
> Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
> up somehow.

I think you are right once again.
(Just the time got a bit out of sync.)