Re: Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 603-suspend2_common-headers.patch

Pekka J Enberg
2005-07-06T16:08:01Z

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 20:22, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > +
> > > +extern int suspend_snprintf(char * buffer, int buffer_size, const char *fmt, ...);
> >
> > What's wrong with regular snprintf?

Nigel Cunningham writes:
> If there's a buffer overrun, it returns the number of bytes it wanted to
> use, not the number actually used.

But on buffer overrun, you know it wrote size-1 characters. I am unconvinced
you need a special snprintf() for suspend. Are there other potential users?
If not, please consider dropping suspend_snprintf completelely.

Pekka