Re: [0/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12

Nigel Cunningham
2005-07-07T12:17:55Z

Hi.

On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com> wrote:
>
> > I've been thinking about this some more and wondering whether I should
> > just replace swsusp. I really don't want to step on your toes though.
> > What would you like to see happen?
>
> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing
> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning.

I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to
ram - just the suspend to disk part.

Regards,

Nigel
--
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.
Be amazed that people believe it happened.