From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261249AbVGLH4y (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:56:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261253AbVGLH4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:56:53 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:60594 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261249AbVGLH43 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 03:56:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:56:20 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] [42/48] Suspend2 2.1.9.8 for 2.6.12: 618-core.patch Message-ID: <20050712075620.GC1854@elf.ucw.cz> References: <11206164393426@foobar.com> <11206164443244@foobar.com> <20050710182106.GI10904@elf.ucw.cz> <1121151572.13869.42.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1121151572.13869.42.camel@localhost> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > Have you seen Christoph's recent fixes to refrigerator? You probably > > have same problems..... And he wanted to move refrigerator to sched/ > > and make it more generic for page migration, too... what about using > > it, too? ;-). > > Yeah. I'm using them already. I must say though that I don't think > sched.h is necessarily the best place for the refrigerator defines. Any > change to those functions and you have to recompile most of the kernel. > Is a refrigerator.h an idea? I do not think those recompiles pose a big problem; we don't want million separate headers. I'd trust Christoph with this. Pavel -- teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.