From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:26:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050714202629.GD28100@us.ibm.com> (raw)
On 14.07.2005 [12:18:41 -0700], john stultz wrote:
<snip>
> Nish has some code, which I hope he'll be sending out shortly that
> does just this, converting the soft-timer subsystem to use absolute
> time instead of ticks for expiration. I feel it both simplifies the
> code and makes it easier to changing the timer interrupt frequency
> while the system is running.
Here's the set of patches John promised :)
1/4: add jiffies conversion helper functions
2/4: core human-time modifications to soft-timer subsystem
3/4: add new human-time schedule_timeout() functions
4/4: rework sys_nanosleep() to use schedule_timeout_nsecs()
The individual patches have more details, but the gist is this:
We no longer use jiffies (the variable) as the basis for determining
what "time" a timer should expire or when it should be added. Instead,
we use a new function, do_monotonic_clock(), which is simply a wrapper
for getnstimeofday(). That is to say, we use uptime in nanoseconds. But,
to avoid modifying the existing soft-timer algorithm, we convert the
64-bit nanosecond value to "timerinterval" units. These units are simply
2^TIMEINTERVAL_BITS nanoseconds in length (thus determined at compile
time).
To sum up, soft-timers now use time (as defined by the
timeofday-subsystem) not ticks. Hopefully, the individual
e-mails/patches make this change clear.
Thanks,
Nish
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-14 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 20:26 Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-07-14 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2005-07-14 21:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-15 12:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-17 0:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] human-time soft-timer core changes Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-18 21:53 ` [RFC][UPDATE PATCH " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] new human-time schedule_timeout() functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] convert sys_nanosleep() to use set_timer_nsecs() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 22:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem Roman Zippel
2005-07-17 0:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050714202629.GD28100@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox