public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:26:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050714202629.GD28100@us.ibm.com> (raw)

On 14.07.2005 [12:18:41 -0700], john stultz wrote:

<snip>

> Nish has some code, which I hope he'll be sending out shortly that
> does just this, converting the soft-timer subsystem to use absolute
> time instead of ticks for expiration. I feel it both simplifies the
> code and makes it easier to changing the timer interrupt frequency
> while the system is running.

Here's the set of patches John promised :)

1/4: add jiffies conversion helper functions

2/4: core human-time modifications to soft-timer subsystem

3/4: add new human-time schedule_timeout() functions

4/4: rework sys_nanosleep() to use schedule_timeout_nsecs()

The individual patches have more details, but the gist is this:

We no longer use jiffies (the variable) as the basis for determining
what "time" a timer should expire or when it should be added. Instead,
we use a new function, do_monotonic_clock(), which is simply a wrapper
for getnstimeofday(). That is to say, we use uptime in nanoseconds. But,
to avoid modifying the existing soft-timer algorithm, we convert the
64-bit nanosecond value to "timerinterval" units. These units are simply
2^TIMEINTERVAL_BITS nanoseconds in length (thus determined at compile
time).

To sum up, soft-timers now use time (as defined by the
timeofday-subsystem) not ticks. Hopefully, the individual
e-mails/patches make this change clear.

Thanks,
Nish

             reply	other threads:[~2005-07-14 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-14 20:26 Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-07-14 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:54   ` Dave Hansen
2005-07-14 21:03     ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-15 12:14       ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-17  0:44         ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] human-time soft-timer core changes Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-18 21:53   ` [RFC][UPDATE PATCH " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] new human-time schedule_timeout() functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] convert sys_nanosleep() to use set_timer_nsecs() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 22:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem Roman Zippel
2005-07-17  0:53   ` Nishanth Aravamudan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050714202629.GD28100@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox