From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10?
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:45:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050715084505.GD1772@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com>
Hi!
> Why can't I expect SWSusp work better and more reliable from release to
> release?
Patches welcome. Or employ someone to do swsusp development for you.
> Some possible things that could help:
>
> *Addopt a no-regressions-allowed policy and everthing stops until any
> identified regressions (in performance, functionally or stability) is fixed
> or the changes are all rolled back. This works really well if in addition
> organized pre-flight testing is done before calling a new version number.
> You simply cannot rely on ad-hock regression testing and reporting. Its got
> too much latency.
This would also mean "no development at all".
> * assign validation folks that the developer need to appease before changes
> are allowed to be accepted into the tree.
So... get me someone to test swsusp in each -rc and -mm
release... that would help. If you can't provide the manpower, why are
you whining?
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-16 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 16:12 Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10? Mark Gross
2005-07-14 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-15 8:45 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
[not found] <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-15 0:38 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 1:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15 2:02 ` Chris Friesen
2005-07-15 2:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 21:33 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 2:16 ` Dave Airlie
2005-07-15 21:39 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 21:47 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 22:19 ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 22:25 ` David Lang
2005-07-15 23:14 ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-18 21:14 ` Mark Gross
2005-07-19 10:12 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-07-15 2:09 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-07-15 2:14 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 13:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050715084505.GD1772@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox