From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:14:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050715121424.GA1775@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050714210328.GJ28100@us.ibm.com>
Hi!
> > > +static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> > > +{
> > > +#if HZ <= NSEC_PER_SEC && !(NSEC_PER_SEC % HZ)
> > > + return (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (u64)j;
> > > +#elif HZ > NSEC_PER_SEC && !(HZ % NSEC_PER_SEC)
> > > + return ((u64)j + (HZ / NSEC_PER_SEC) - 1)/(HZ / NSEC_PER_SEC);
> > > +#else
> > > + return ((u64)j * NSEC_PER_SEC) / HZ;
> > > +#endif
> > > +}
> >
> > That might look a little better something like:
> >
> > static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long __j)
> > {
> > u64 j = __j;
> >
> > if (HZ <= NSEC_PER_SEC && !(NSEC_PER_SEC % HZ))
> > return (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * j;
> > else if (HZ > NSEC_PER_SEC && !(HZ % NSEC_PER_SEC))
> > return (j + (HZ / NSEC_PER_SEC) - 1)/(HZ / NSEC_PER_SEC);
> > else
> > return (j * NSEC_PER_SEC) / HZ;
> > }
> >
> > Compilers are smart :)
>
> Well, I was trying to keep it similar to the other conversion functions.
> I guess the compiler can evaluate the conditional full of constants at
> compile-time regardless of whether it is #if or if ().
>
> I can make these changes if others would like them as well.
Yes, please. And feel free to convert nearby functions, too ;-).
Pavel
--
teflon -- maybe it is a trademark, but it should not be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-16 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 20:26 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] add jiffies_to_nsecs() helper and fix up size of usecs Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2005-07-14 21:03 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-15 12:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-07-17 0:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] human-time soft-timer core changes Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-18 21:53 ` [RFC][UPDATE PATCH " Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] new human-time schedule_timeout() functions Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 20:43 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] convert sys_nanosleep() to use set_timer_nsecs() Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-07-14 22:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] new human-time soft-timer subsystem Roman Zippel
2005-07-17 0:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050715121424.GA1775@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox