From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262012AbVGOSS7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:18:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261997AbVGOSRB (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:17:01 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]:35736 "EHLO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263312AbVGOSQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:16:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:15:21 -0400 From: Tom Vier To: Andi Kleen Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: NUMA support for dual core Opteron Message-ID: <20050715181521.GC30163@zero> Reply-To: Tom Vier References: <2ea3fae10507141058c476927@mail.gmail.com> <20050714190929.GL23619@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050714190929.GL23619@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:09:29PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > However with 90+W CPUs I would strongly recommend having support > for PowerNow! and the old style PST table doesn't support > dual core or SMP, so you need ACPI for that anyways. Do opterons even support powernow? The proc or sysfs control file never shows up on mine and the cpu flags don't list it. Then again, neither does my athlon64. They're all in 32bit mode. -- Tom Vier DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE