From: Nicholas Hans Simmonds <nhstux@gmail.com>
To: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@transmeta.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filesystem capabilities support
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:23:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050716142328.GA9125@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507142005.j6EK5Hhn030304@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:05:17PM -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Nicholas Hans Simmonds <nhstux@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Other than this, what are the general thoughts about this method as
> > opposed to just using a well defined byte order?
>
> I'd prefer a defined byte order. That way it won't bite too hard if I
> happen to move a filesystem (image) from PC to SPARC or whatever.
> --
> Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
> Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
Fair enough. With inotify now in Linus' tree, my patch will conflict
so I've fixed this in the following new patch which also stores the
xattr data in big-endian format. I've tested it this time and it
seems to work. Also if anyone can think of a neater method of byte-
swapping the structure (some sort of string operation?) I'd be glad
to hear it as the current code looks a bit ugly.
Thanks as ever,
Nicholas
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/unistd.h>
@@ -303,6 +304,16 @@ ssize_t vfs_write(struct file *file, con
else
ret = do_sync_write(file, buf, count, pos);
if (ret > 0) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ struct dentry *d = file->f_dentry;
+ if(d->d_inode->i_op && d->d_inode->i_op->
+ removexattr) {
+ down(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+ d->d_inode->i_op->removexattr(d,
+ XATTR_CAP_SET);
+ up(&d->d_inode->i_sem);
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
fsnotify_modify(file->f_dentry);
current->wchar += ret;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -39,7 +39,19 @@ typedef struct __user_cap_data_struct {
__u32 permitted;
__u32 inheritable;
} __user *cap_user_data_t;
-
+
+struct cap_xattr_data {
+ __u32 version;
+ __u32 mask_effective;
+ __u32 effective;
+ __u32 mask_permitted;
+ __u32 permitted;
+ __u32 mask_inheritable;
+ __u32 inheritable;
+};
+
+#define XATTR_CAP_SET XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX "cap_set"
+
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ config SECURITY_CAPABILITIES
This enables the "default" Linux capabilities functionality.
If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer Y.
+config SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ bool "Filesystem Capabilities (EXPERIMENTAL)"
+ depends on SECURITY && EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ This permits a process' capabilities to be set by an extended
+ attribute in the security namespace (security.cap_set).
+
config SECURITY_ROOTPLUG
tristate "Root Plug Support"
depends on USB && SECURITY
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -111,9 +111,15 @@ void cap_capset_set (struct task_struct
int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ ssize_t (*bprm_getxattr)(struct dentry *,const char *,void *,size_t);
+ struct dentry *bprm_dentry;
+ ssize_t ret;
+ struct cap_xattr_data caps;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
/* Copied from fs/exec.c:prepare_binprm. */
- /* We don't have VFS support for capabilities yet */
cap_clear (bprm->cap_inheritable);
cap_clear (bprm->cap_permitted);
cap_clear (bprm->cap_effective);
@@ -134,6 +140,44 @@ int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_
if (bprm->e_uid == 0)
cap_set_full (bprm->cap_effective);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES
+ /* Locate any VFS capabilities: */
+
+ bprm_dentry = bprm->file->f_dentry;
+ if(!(bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op &&
+ bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr))
+ return 0;
+ bprm_getxattr = bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_op->getxattr;
+
+ down(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+ ret = bprm_getxattr(bprm_dentry,XATTR_CAP_SET,&caps,sizeof(caps));
+ up(&bprm_dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
+ if(ret == sizeof(caps)) {
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.version);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.effective);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_effective);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.permitted);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_permitted);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.inheritable);
+ be32_to_cpus(&caps.mask_inheritable);
+ if(caps.version == _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION) {
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) &= caps.mask_effective;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_effective) |= caps.effective;
+
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) &= caps.mask_permitted;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_permitted) |= caps.permitted;
+
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) &= caps.mask_inheritable;
+ cap_t(bprm->cap_inheritable) |= caps.inheritable;
+ } else
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: %s capability set has "
+ "incorrect version %08X. Correct version "
+ "is %08X.\n",bprm->filename,caps.version,
+ _LINUX_CAPABILITY_VERSION);
+ }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECURITY_FS_CAPABILITIES */
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-15 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-02 21:41 [PATCH] Filesystem capabilities support Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-02 23:01 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-07-03 0:14 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-06 4:56 ` Nathan Scott
2005-07-04 14:27 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-13 6:29 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-13 17:51 ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-14 4:29 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
2005-07-14 20:05 ` Horst von Brand
2005-07-16 14:23 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds [this message]
2005-07-15 3:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-16 15:42 ` Nicholas Hans Simmonds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-24 13:36 Arnout Engelen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050716142328.GA9125@laptop \
--to=nhstux@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@transmeta.com \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox