From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261212AbVGQI2y (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:28:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261217AbVGQI2y (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:28:54 -0400 Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.126.206.180]:54608 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261212AbVGQI2x (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 04:28:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:28:52 +0200 From: Rogier Wolff To: Nish Aravamudan Cc: Jeff Garzik , "David S. Miller" , olh@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/82] changing CONFIG_LOCALVERSION rebuilds too much, for no good reason. Message-ID: <20050717082852.GA3786@bitwizard.nl> References: <20050710193508.0.PmFpst2252.2247.olh@nectarine.suse.de> <20050710.144910.15269860.davem@davemloft.net> <42D1A039.9090807@pobox.com> <29495f1d050710211862c4e543@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29495f1d050710211862c4e543@mail.gmail.com> Organization: BitWizard.nl User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:18:15PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > one for the SCSI subsystem. If those individual driver maintainers' > files are being modified, should they be CC'ed, or is the big patch > just sent to the SCSI maintainer (in this example)? I just want to > make sure the correct patch-chain is respected. As a patch maintainer, CCed on ONE of the 82 patches, I wouldn't have minded getting CCed on a patch that included the change to my driver. (as chunk xx/82 in the diff). Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ