public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:14:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200507181414.02262.mgross@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507151914300.25957@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>

On Friday 15 July 2005 16:14, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Mark Gross wrote:
> > What would be wrong in expecting the folks making the driver changes
> > have some story on how they are validating there changes don't break
> > existing working hardware?  I could probly be accomplished in open
> > source with subsystem testing volenteers.
>
> Are you volunteering ?

I am not volunteering.  That last sentence was meant to say "It could 
probubly..."

I'm just poking at a process change that would include a more formal 
validation / testing phase as part of getting change into the stable tree.  I 
don't have any silver bullets.

-- 
--mgross
BTW: This may or may not be the opinion of my employer, more likely not.  


  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-18 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-15  0:38 ` Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10? Andi Kleen
2005-07-15  1:45   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15  2:02     ` Chris Friesen
2005-07-15  2:06       ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-15  2:09         ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 21:33           ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15  2:16         ` Dave Airlie
2005-07-15 21:39           ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15  2:09     ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 21:47       ` Mark Gross
2005-07-15 22:19         ` Dave Jones
2005-07-15 22:25         ` David Lang
2005-07-15 23:14         ` Rik van Riel
2005-07-18 21:14           ` Mark Gross [this message]
2005-07-19 10:12             ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2005-07-15  2:09   ` Parag Warudkar
2005-07-15  2:14     ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 13:32     ` Alan Cox
2005-07-14 16:12 Mark Gross
2005-07-14 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-15  8:45 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200507181414.02262.mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox