From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261547AbVGRW3k (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:29:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261663AbVGRW3k (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:29:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.istop.com ([66.11.167.126]:45288 "EHLO smtp.istop.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261547AbVGRW3j (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:29:39 -0400 From: Daniel Phillips To: Jan Engelhardt Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:29:36 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Richard Gooch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050621062926.GB15062@kroah.com> <17115.55954.942676.450479@mailix.sanjose.privnets> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507190829.36794.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 19 July 2005 06:12, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > What is more news to me: > ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug/udev-FAQ ) > Q: Why was devfs marked OBSOLETE if udev is not finished yet? > A: To quote Al Viro (Linux VFS kernel maintainer): > ==> - the devfs maintainer/author disappeared and stoped maintaining the > code Chased out by the same Al Viro, more like it. Not that I like devfs at all, but it's a shame to see such revisionism in an otherwise respectable document. Regards, Daniel