Re: [PATCH] pci_find_device --> pci_get_device

[Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:53:38PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Rogier Wolff napsal(a):

> I don't know, if you think it global, or if am I here with other
> fellows (no, I'm not).  I don't know what kind of comment you have
> on your mind. Could you, please, specify it more.  I only changed
> names of called functions and added some pci_dev_put, what should I
> comment?

I meant: that IF I'm right that there needs to be more pci_dev_put, 
that needs to be noted in the source. 

If you know that there needs to be a put, but you have decided you
don't know where to put it exactly, then that needs to be in a comment
so that someone looking at the code after you will be able to put it
in. Otherwise the new person will think: He might have had a smarter
plan and will do the pci_dev_put somewhere else. 

	Roger. 


-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. 
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! 
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ