From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (2/9)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:27:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050720042755.GD26552@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050719234843.14cfb1ec.khali@linux-fr.org>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:48:43PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Convert i2c-isa from a dumb i2c_adapter into a pseudo i2c-core for ISA
> hardware monitoring drivers. The isa i2c_adapter is no more registered
> with i2c-core, drivers have to explicitely connect to it using the new
> i2c_isa_{add,del}_driver interface.
Ick, when I did this originally it was a hack, and it's still a hack.
It's sad to see it spreading around, but that's proably my fault...
Anyway, what are your plans for after this? How long will this code
stay around? What do you want to do next?
I don't have any real objections to this patch series at all, just very
curious as to your proposed roadmap after this.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-20 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-19 21:39 [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (0/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (1/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-20 4:26 ` Greg KH
2005-07-20 21:03 ` Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 21:48 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (2/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-20 4:27 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-07-20 21:46 ` Jean Delvare
2005-07-25 0:35 ` Greg KH
2005-07-25 17:28 ` Jean Delvare
2005-07-26 22:54 ` Greg KH
2005-07-27 20:21 ` Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 21:51 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (3/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 21:53 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (4/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 21:56 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (5/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-26 22:33 ` patch i2c-hwmon-split-05.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2005-07-19 21:57 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (6/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 22:02 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (7/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-19 22:05 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (8/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-26 22:33 ` patch i2c-hwmon-split-08.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2005-07-19 22:09 ` [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (9/9) Jean Delvare
2005-07-26 22:33 ` patch i2c-hwmon-split-09.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050720042755.GD26552@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox