From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261733AbVGTEub (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:50:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261737AbVGTEtg (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:49:36 -0400 Received: from host218.bellglobal.com ([204.101.166.218]:40971 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261733AbVGTEte (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:49:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:27:55 -0400 From: Greg KH To: Jean Delvare Cc: LKML , LM Sensors Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] I2C: Separate non-i2c hwmon drivers from i2c-core (2/9) Message-ID: <20050720042755.GD26552@kroah.com> References: <20050719233902.40282559.khali@linux-fr.org> <20050719234843.14cfb1ec.khali@linux-fr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050719234843.14cfb1ec.khali@linux-fr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:48:43PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Convert i2c-isa from a dumb i2c_adapter into a pseudo i2c-core for ISA > hardware monitoring drivers. The isa i2c_adapter is no more registered > with i2c-core, drivers have to explicitely connect to it using the new > i2c_isa_{add,del}_driver interface. Ick, when I did this originally it was a hack, and it's still a hack. It's sad to see it spreading around, but that's proably my fault... Anyway, what are your plans for after this? How long will this code stay around? What do you want to do next? I don't have any real objections to this patch series at all, just very curious as to your proposed roadmap after this. thanks, greg k-h