From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261625AbVGTBCi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:02:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261726AbVGTBCi (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:02:38 -0400 Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.184]:5602 "EHLO mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261625AbVGTBCe (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2005 21:02:34 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: dwalker@mvista.com Subject: Re: Interbench real time benchmark results Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:04:48 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org References: <200507200816.11386.kernel@kolivas.org> <20050719223216.GA4194@elte.hu> <1121819037.26927.75.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <1121819037.26927.75.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507201104.48249.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23 am, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > - networking is another frequent source of latencies - it might make > > sense to add a workload doing lots of socket IO. (localhost might be > > enough, but not for everything) > > The Gnutella test? I've seen some massive latencies on mainline when throwing network loads from outside, but with my limited knowledge I haven't found a way to implement such a thing locally. I'll look at this gnutella test at some stage to see what it is and if I can adopt the load within interbench. Thanks for the suggestion. Cheers, Con