From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261646AbVGUF4M (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:56:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261647AbVGUF4M (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:56:12 -0400 Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.95]:56680 "HELO smtp110.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261646AbVGUF4L (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:56:11 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, ncunningham@cyclades.com Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Corrected Workqueue freezer support. Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:56:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1121923979.2939.237.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1121923979.2939.237.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507210056.09515.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:32, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > (Fixed to remove the latent mention of syncthreads). > > This patch implements freezer support for workqueues. The current > refrigerator implementation makes all workqueues NOFREEZE, regardless of > whether they need to be or not. > I think kseriod and kgameportd threads can be left freezable. -- Dmitry