public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Voluspa <lista1@telia.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:33:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050721203327.2f82eed8.lista1@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490507211114227720b0@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:14:32 +0200 Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 7/21/05, Voluspa <lista1@telia.com> wrote:
[...]
> > 
> Ok, so with an idle machine, different HZ makes no noticeable
> difference, but I'd suspect things would be different if the machine
> was actually doing some work.

I first thought about loading with a loop of md5sum /somedir, play a
wav, fetch a couple of webpages etc. But since the talk has been that
the powersave would come from CPU sleep between "ticks" (I know, I know,
it's not ticks) not having to wake up so often, I decided against a
load.

> Would be more interresting to see how long it lasts with a light load
> and with a heavy load.

I won't do that unless heavily beaten ;-) The battery charge time is
2h10 minutes...

Mvh
Mats Johannesson
--

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-21 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-21 18:04 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference Voluspa
2005-07-21 18:14 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-21 18:33   ` Voluspa [this message]
2005-07-22 14:48   ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-22 17:15     ` Voluspa
2005-07-22 18:02       ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-22 18:28         ` Voluspa
2005-07-22 18:44         ` Voluspa
2005-07-25 10:21           ` Tony Lindgren
2005-07-25 18:30             ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-21 18:49 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2005-07-21 19:01   ` Voluspa
2005-07-26 13:14 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-07-26 14:53   ` Voluspa
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-26  5:23 Brown, Len
2005-07-26 14:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-26  6:29 Voluspa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050721203327.2f82eed8.lista1@telia.com \
    --to=lista1@telia.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox