From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262142AbVGVUCM (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:02:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262156AbVGVUCM (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:02:12 -0400 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:29597 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262153AbVGVUCF (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:02:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:01:32 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: bert hubert Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, relayfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com, varap@us.ibm.com, karim@opersys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zanussi@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks? Message-Id: <20050722130132.60f1524e.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050720214519.GA13155@outpost.ds9a.nl> References: <17107.6290.734560.231978@tut.ibm.com> <20050716210759.GA1850@outpost.ds9a.nl> <17113.38067.551471.862551@tut.ibm.com> <20050717090137.GB5161@outpost.ds9a.nl> <17114.31916.451621.501383@tut.ibm.com> <20050717194558.GC27353@outpost.ds9a.nl> <1121693274.12862.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050720142732.761354de.pj@sgi.com> <20050720214519.GA13155@outpost.ds9a.nl> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Another vote in favor of relayfs here ... I am reminded by my good colleagues at SGI that relayfs is a key to the Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT), which is in turn an important technology for some product(s) on which SGI is working. It is uses such as this which speak to the value of including relayfs in the kernel. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401