From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261333AbVGVQxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:53:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262116AbVGVQxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:53:19 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:39439 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261333AbVGVQxS (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:53:18 -0400 Date: 22 Jul 2005 18:53:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:53:16 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Ashok Raj Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86_64.org Subject: Re: Extending defconfig for x86_64 Message-ID: <20050722165316.GA19123@muc.de> References: <20050721124739.A11717@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050721124739.A11717@unix-os.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:47:39PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote: > Hi Andi > > This patch is a trivial one. Provide a differnet defconfig for x86_64. > > Each time people get bitten by which scsi controller/eth to use. It might > be possible to setup configs for other systems as well, if there are well > known system names to make it simple for devl. The defconfig should be pretty complete. I don't want to add more to the standard kernel right now sorry because if we start with that it would never end. But you can always store them outside the kernel tree. -Andi