From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Martin MOKREJ <mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050722231126.GB3160@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E04D11.20005@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 03:34:09AM +0200, Martin MOKREJ? wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Martin,
> I think the discussion going on here in another thread about lack
> of positive information on how many testers successfully tested certain
> kernel version can be easily solved with real solution.
>
> How about opening separate "project" in bugzilla.kernel.org named
> kernel-testers or whatever, where whenever cvs/svn/bk gatekeepers
> would release some kernel patch, would open an empty "bugreport"
> for that version, say for 2.6.13-rc3-git4.
>
> Anybody willing to join the crew who cared to download the patch
> and tested the kernel would post just a single comment/follow-up
> to _that_ "bugreport" with either "positive" rating or URL
> of his own bugreport with some new bug. When the bug get's closed
> it would be immediately obvious in the 2.6.13-rc3-git4 bug ticket
> as that bug will be striked-through as closed.
>
> Then, we could easily just browse through and see that 2.6.13-rc2
> was tested by 33 fellows while 3 of them found a problem and 2 such
> problems were closed since then.
>...
most likely, only a small minory of the people downloading a patch would
register at such a "project".
The important part of the work, the bug reports, can already today go to
lnux-kernel and/or the Bugzilla.
You'd spend efforts for such a "project" that would only produce some
numbers of questionable value.
> Martin
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-22 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-22 1:34 Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22 2:10 ` Mark Nipper
2005-07-22 2:38 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22 2:40 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-22 23:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-22 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-07-24 18:45 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-24 18:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-24 19:10 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-23 0:44 Blaisorblade
2005-07-23 0:50 ` David Lang
2005-07-23 0:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-07-23 1:07 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:15 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:34 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 2:40 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 9:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-07-23 16:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 3:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-23 9:21 ` Jesper Krogh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050722231126.GB3160@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmokrejs@ribosome.natur.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox