From: "Al Boldi" <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: "'Lee Revell'" <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: "'Blaisorblade'" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Andrian Bunk'" <bunk@stusta.de>,
"'H. Peter Anvin'" <hpa@zytor.com>, <torvalds@osdl.org>,
"'Alejandro Bonilla'" <abonilla@linuxwireless.org>
Subject: RE: Giving developers clue how many testers verifiedcertain kernel version
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200507230535.IAA03518@raad.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1122088863.6510.19.camel@mindpipe>
Lee Revell wrote: {
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:15 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> OK, I will, but I first of all need to learn how to tell if benchmarks
> are better or worse.
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding scheduler
related interactivity regressions.
}
Scheduler performance does not imply net system performance.
In fact, a well tuned scheduler hides absolute performance-related issues!
--Al
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-23 5:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-23 0:44 Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version Blaisorblade
2005-07-23 0:50 ` David Lang
2005-07-23 0:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-07-23 1:07 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:15 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:34 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 2:40 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 9:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-07-23 16:45 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 5:34 ` Al Boldi [this message]
2005-07-23 3:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-23 9:21 ` Jesper Krogh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200507230535.IAA03518@raad.intranet \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=abonilla@linuxwireless.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox