From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261446AbVGWHlE (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:41:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261514AbVGWHlD (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:41:03 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:29709 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261446AbVGWHlC (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:41:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:40:49 +0100 From: Russell King To: Pavel Machek Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie Subject: Re: fix suspend/resume irq request free for yenta.. Message-ID: <20050723084049.A7921@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Pavel Machek , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie References: <200507221816.19424.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20050723002924.GA1988@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20050723002924.GA1988@elf.ucw.cz>; from pavel@ucw.cz on Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 02:29:24AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 02:29:24AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Is it necessary to do free_irq for suspend? Shouldn't disable_irq > > be enough? > > Due to recent changes in ACPI, yes, it is neccessary. What if some other driver is sharing the IRQ, and requires IRQs to be enabled for the resume to complete? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core