From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261569AbVGWMez (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261609AbVGWMez (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:55 -0400 Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.44]:57025 "EHLO poros.telenet-ops.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261569AbVGWMey (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:34:54 -0400 From: Jan De Luyck To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:35:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Pavel Machek , Tony Lindgren MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507231435.05015.lkml@kcore.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work. The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. Thanks, Jan -- Yow! I'm having a quadrophonic sensation of two winos alone in a steel mill!