From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261375AbVGWMvX@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261375AbVGWMvX (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:51:23 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261609AbVGWMvX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:51:23 -0400
Received: from lugor.de ([212.112.242.222]:46527 "EHLO solar.mylinuxtime.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261375AbVGWMvW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:51:22 -0400
From: Christian Hesse <mail@earthworm.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:50:56 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
Cc: Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
References: <200507231435.05015.lkml@kcore.org>
In-Reply-To: <200507231435.05015.lkml@kcore.org>
X-Face: 1\p'dhO'VZk,x0lx6U}!Y*9UjU4n2@4c<"a*K%3Eiu'VwM|-OYs;S-PH>4EdJMfGyycC)=?utf-8?q?k=0A=09=3Anv*xqk4C?=@1b8tdr||mALWpN[2|~h#Iv;)M"O$$#P9Kg+S8+O#%EJx0TBH7b&Q<m)=?utf-8?q?n=23Q=2Eo=0A=09kE=7E=26T=5D0cQX6=5D?=<q!HEE,F}O'Jd#lx/+){Gr@W~J`h7sTS(M+oe5<=?utf-8?q?3O7GY9y=5Fi!qG=26Vv=5CD8/=0A=09=254?=@&~$Z@UwV'NQ$Ph&3fZc(qbDO?{LN'nk>+kRh4`C3[KN`-1uT-TD_m
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1293342.VE1K3eo7UN";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200507231451.04630.mail@earthworm.de>
X-Spam-Flag: NO
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

--nextPart1293342.VE1K3eo7UN
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 23 July 2005 14:35, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it
> actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I don=
't
> have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 hours i get
> out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use pattern at work.
>
> The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the patch
> is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but resuming go=
es
> into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to keep the
> powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system)
>
> Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful..

I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far...

[1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it

=2D-=20
Christian

--nextPart1293342.VE1K3eo7UN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBC4j04lZfG2c8gdSURAhF6AJ0b/++ID361dlgz0p06Qoh5y2/RzwCg5Gwr
VdEhFsDMmulBKsdA2Q/Y/L4=
=ybrG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1293342.VE1K3eo7UN--