From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261367AbVGXPLM (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:11:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261370AbVGXPLM (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:11:12 -0400 Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.44]:4562 "EHLO poros.telenet-ops.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261367AbVGXPLI (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:11:08 -0400 From: Jan De Luyck To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.12.3] dyntick 050610-1 breaks makes S3 suspend Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:11:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: Pavel Machek , Christian Hesse , Tony Lindgren References: <200507231435.05015.lkml@kcore.org> <200507231451.04630.mail@earthworm.de> <20050724142318.GA1778@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050724142318.GA1778@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507241711.23217.lkml@kcore.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 24 July 2005 16:23, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > I recently tried out dyntick 050610-1 against 2.6.12.3, works great, it > > > actually makes a noticeable difference on my laptop's battery life. I > > > don't have hard numbers, lets just say that instead of the usual ~3 > > > hours i get out of it, i was ~4 before it started nagging, usual use > > > pattern at work. > > > > > > The only gripe I have with it that it stops S3 from working. If the > > > patch is compiled in the kernel, it makes S3 suspend correctly, but > > > resuming goes into a solid hang (nothing get's it back alive, have to > > > keep the powerbutton for ~5 secs to shutdown the system) > > > > > > Anything I could test? The logs don't give anything useful.. > > > > I reported this some time ago [1], but there's no sulution so far... > > > > [1] http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4b4NI-7mJ-9%40gated-at.bofh.it > > Does it also break if swsusp? Does it break if you replace enter sleep > function with some kind of dummy functions? (Or perhaps S1 is enough > for this test?) I have only tried with S3.. how do I test with S1? Jan -- YOW!! I'm in a very clever and adorable INSANE ASYLUM!!