From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262084AbVGZVLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:11:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262068AbVGZVLE (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:11:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:25014 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262087AbVGZVKe (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 17:10:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:12:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Rik van Riel Cc: pbadari@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Memory pressure handling with iSCSI Message-Id: <20050726141215.691379a2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1122399331.6433.29.camel@dyn9047017102.beaverton.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > After KS & OLS discussions about memory pressure, I wanted to re-do > > iSCSI testing with "dd"s to see if we are throttling writes. > > Could you also try with shared writable mmap, to see if that > works ok or triggers a deadlock ? > That'll cause problems for sure, but we need to get `dd' right first :(