From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: David.Mosberger@acm.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:16:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050728081622.GA22025@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10613.1122538148@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
* Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote:
> >yeah. I'd too suggest to call it prefetch_stack(), and not make it a
> >macro & hook but something defined on all arches, with for now only ia64
> >having any real code in the inline function.
> >
> >i'm wondering, is the switch_stack at the same/similar place as
> >next->thread_info? If yes then we could simply do a
> >prefetch(next->thread_info).
>
> No, they can be up to 30K apart. See include/asm-ia64/ptrace.h.
> thread_info is at ~0xda0, depending on the config. The switch_stack
> can be as high as 0x7bd0 in the kernel stack, depending on why the
> task is sleeping.
is the switch_stack the same thing as the kernel stack? If yes then we
want to have something like:
prefetch(kernel_stack(next));
to make it more generic. By default kernel_stack(next) could be
next->thread_info (to make sure we prefetch something real). On e.g.
x86/x64, kernel_stack(next) should be something like next->thread.esp.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-28 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-27 22:07 Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-27 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 23:23 ` david mosberger
2005-07-28 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 8:09 ` Keith Owens
2005-07-28 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2005-07-28 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 19:14 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-29 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-07-29 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-31 16:27 ` hashed spinlocks Daniel Walker
2005-07-31 18:46 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 19:06 ` Daniel Walker
2005-07-31 19:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 19:16 ` Daniel Walker
2005-07-29 8:30 ` Add prefetch switch stack hook in scheduler function Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-29 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 8:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-29 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2005-07-29 10:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 7:22 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-29 7:45 ` Keith Owens
2005-07-29 8:02 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-29 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 9:02 ` Russell King
2005-07-29 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-29 7:38 ` Keith Owens
2005-07-29 8:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-28 8:31 ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-28 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-28 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 9:34 ` Nick Piggin
2005-07-28 10:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-07-28 10:29 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-29 15:18 linux
2005-07-29 15:49 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050728081622.GA22025@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=David.Mosberger@acm.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox