From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, openib-general@openib.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mj@ucw.cz, ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:17:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050728161720.GA23507@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D282808@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:57:51PM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > > Greg> Hm, you do realize that io_remap_pfn_range() is the same
> > > Greg> thing as remap_pfn_range() on i386, right?
> > >
> > > Greg> So, why would this patch change anything?
> > >
> > > It's not the same thing under Xen. I think this patch
> > fixes userspace
> > > access to PCI memory for XenLinux.
> >
> > But Xen is a separate arch, and hence, will get different pci
> > arch specific functions, right?
> >
> > In short, what is this patch trying to fix? What is the
> > problem anyone is seeing with the existing code?
>
> As I understand it, remap_pfn_range should be used for mapping pages
> that are backed by memory, and io_remap_pfn_range should be used for
> mapping MMIO regions.
> There's a distinciton between the two for architectures like Sparc and
> xen/x86.
I agree, but not for i386, which is what the patch was trying to change.
If this is a fix for xen, fine, then say so in the changelog information
for the patch, as it is, no such information was given.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-28 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-28 11:57 [openib-general] Re: [PATCH] arch/xx/pci: remap_pfn_range -> io_remap_pfn_range Ian Pratt
2005-07-28 14:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-07-28 16:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-07-31 8:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-28 14:40 [openib-general] " Ian Pratt
2005-07-25 22:32 Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-07-28 4:26 ` Greg KH
2005-07-28 4:30 ` [openib-general] " Roland Dreier
2005-07-28 4:50 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050728161720.GA23507@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=mj@ucw.cz \
--cc=mst@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
--cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox