From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261695AbVG1QtA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:49:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261696AbVG1QrH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:47:07 -0400 Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([24.172.12.4]:37898 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261695AbVG1Qpv (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:45:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:45:35 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel guide to space (updated) Message-ID: <20050728164532.GD9110@tuxdriver.com> Mail-Followup-To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050728145353.GL11644@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:52:25AM -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > 7. Comments > > Don't use C99 // comments. > > I don't think this is correct. In fact, I remember a discussion > where // was preferred for new code. Ick...I hope not... John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com