From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262044AbVHANQz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262066AbVHANQy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:16:54 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:2196 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262044AbVHANPt (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:15:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:17:51 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6-block:master] block: fix cfq_find_next_crq Message-ID: <20050801131750.GD22569@suse.de> References: <20050726132706.GC23916@htj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050726132706.GC23916@htj.dyndns.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 26 2005, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hi, > > In cfq_find_next_crq(), when determining rbnext, if > rb_next(&last->rb_node) is NULL, rb_first() is used without checking > if it equals last. If it equals last, rbnext should be NULL not last. > This bug is masked by duplicate calls to cfq_find_next_crq which ends > up clearing cfqq->next_crq as, on the second call, last isn't on rb > tree. > > This patch fixes cfq_find_next_crq() and removes extra calls to > cfq_update_next_crq(). Thanks, looks good! -- Jens Axboe