public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tony@atomide.com, tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:49:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508021549.48711.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508021443.55429.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 02:43 pm, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This has slightly more build fixes than the last one I posted and boots and
> runs fine on my laptop. So far at absolute idle it appears this pentiumM
> 1.7 is claiming to have _25%_ more battery life. I'll need to investigate
> further to see the real power savings.

As a crude data point of idle system running a full kde desktop environment on 
powersave with minimal backlight and just chatting on IRC I find it's just 
under 10% battery life difference. I have confirmed in the past the accuracy 
of the remaining capacity exported by the battery and the time to complete 
discharge. This saving is similar in magnitude to the 1000->100Hz savings of 
7% mentioned on other threads. While nothing like the 25% initially suggested 
it is still significant. Anyone with a more accurate means of testing this 
interested?

Cheers,
Con

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-02  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-02  4:43 [patch] i386 dynamic ticks 2.6.13-rc4 (code reordered) Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  5:35 ` [ck] " Michael Marineau
2005-08-02  5:49 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-02  5:52   ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02  5:56     ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  6:24       ` Lee Revell
2005-08-02  7:17         ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02  7:39           ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  8:15             ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 10:54               ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 11:31                 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 12:04                   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02  7:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-08-02 14:01 ` Avuton Olrich
2005-08-02 14:05   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-06 14:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-08-06 15:00   ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-08  5:43     ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-08-08 21:54     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 18:37 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2005-08-10  6:44 ` Thomas Renninger
2005-08-10  6:57   ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200508021549.48711.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox