public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@hp.com>
To: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 18:39:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050804013910.GG16417@esmail.cup.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c44050803175873fb0569@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:58:11PM -0700, yhlu wrote:
> Roland,
> 
> In LinuxBIOS, If I enable the prefmem64 to use real 64 range. the IB
> driver in Kernel can not be loaded.

Can you provide a few more details about the configuration?
o kernel version
o architecture (i386 or x86-64)
o post the full console output from power up?

Recent email on linux-pci raised awareness that 32-bit kernel
can not support 64-bit PCI MMIO addresses. struct resource (defined in
include/linux/ioport.h) defines the start/end field as "unsigned long".
That's only 32-bit on i386 kernels.

> PCI: 04:00.0 18 <- [0xfcf0000000 - 0xfcf07fffff] prefmem64
> PCI: 04:00.0 20 <- [0xfce0000000 - 0xfcefffffff] prefmem64                      
I have to wonder if those BARs are truly prefetchable.
Does Mellanox assume CPU is the only one to write the 3rd BAR (RAM)
and the CPU implements a write-through cache (vs write back)?

I'm just guessing because I don't understand exactly how the
256MB of onboard RAM is accessed.

hth,
grant

> 
> ib_mthca: Mellanox InfiniBand HCA driver v0.06 (June 23, 2005)
> ib_mthca: Initializing Mellanox Technologies MT25208 InfiniHost III Ex (Tavor c)
> ib_mthca 0000:04:00.0: Failed to initialize queue pair table, aborting.
> ib_mthca: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -16
> _______________________________________________
> openib-general mailing list
> openib-general@openib.org
> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

And I have to wonder if those BARs truly are prefetchable.
It would imply only the CPU writes them and 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-04  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-28 20:31 [PATCH 0/2] REALLY final InfiniBand updates for 2.6.13 Roland Dreier
2005-07-28 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes Roland Dreier
2005-07-28 20:31   ` [PATCH 2/2] [IPoIB] Handle sending of unicast RARP responses Roland Dreier
2005-08-04  0:58   ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes yhlu
2005-08-04  1:39     ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2005-08-04  4:44     ` mthca and LinuxBIOS (was: [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes) Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 16:33       ` yhlu
2005-08-04 16:36         ` mthca and LinuxBIOS Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 17:23           ` yhlu
2005-08-04 18:01             ` yhlu
2005-08-04 18:35               ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 19:30                 ` yhlu
2005-08-05  3:47                   ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-05 18:03                     ` yhlu
2005-08-05 18:07                       ` yhlu
2005-08-05 18:13                         ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-05 18:26                           ` yhlu
2005-08-05 19:25                             ` yhlu
2005-08-05 19:45                               ` yhlu
2005-08-05 20:28                                 ` yhlu
2005-08-05 20:38                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-05 22:00                                     ` Greg KH
2005-08-05 22:25                                       ` yhlu
2005-08-05 23:03                                         ` Greg KH
2005-08-06  5:29                                           ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2005-08-05 23:06                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-05 23:59                                         ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2005-08-06  4:33                                           ` Grant Grundler
2005-08-06 23:52                                             ` yhlu
2005-08-07  9:49                                             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2005-08-05 18:11                       ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-06  0:57                       ` yhlu
2005-08-06  1:30                         ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-06  2:47                           ` yhlu
2005-08-04  6:42     ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-08-04 18:22       ` yhlu
2005-08-08 12:21         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050804013910.GG16417@esmail.cup.hp.com \
    --to=iod00d@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox