From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)" <saripalli@hp.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 15:13:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508041513.51692.vda@ilport.com.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508041138.38216@bilbo.math.uni-mannheim.de>
On Thursday 04 August 2005 12:38, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD) wrote:
> >Patch 1 of 2
> >
> >This patch fixes the "#error this is too much stack" in 2.6 kernel.
> >Using kmalloc to allocate memory to ulFibreFrame.
>
> Good idea.
>
> >Please consider this for inclusion
>
> Your patch is line-wrapped and can't be applied. Your second patch is also
> line wrapped. And it touches this file in a different way so they can't be
> applied cleanly over each other.
>
> >diff -burpN old/drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c
> >new/drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c
> >--- old/drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c 2005-07-12 22:52:29.000000000
> >+0530
> >+++ new/drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c 2005-07-18 22:19:54.229947176
> >+0530
> >@@ -606,22 +606,25 @@ static int PeekIMQEntry( PTACHYON fcChip
> > if( (fcChip->IMQ->QEntry[CI].type & 0x1FF) == 0x104 )
> > {
> > TachFCHDR_GCMND* fchs;
> >-#error This is too much stack
> >- ULONG ulFibreFrame[2048/4]; // max DWORDS in incoming FC
> >Frame
> >+ ULONG *ulFibreFrame; // max DWORDS in incoming FC Frame
> > USHORT SFQpi = (USHORT)(fcChip->IMQ->QEntry[CI].word[0] &
> >0x0fffL);
>
> Why not use a void* here as type for the buffer? Or even better: remove this
> at all and directly use fchs as target, because this is the only place where
> this buffer goes to?
>
> >+ ulFibreFrame = kmalloc((2048/4), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> The size bug was already found by Dave Jones. This never should be written
> this way (not your fault). The array should have been [2048/sizeof(ULONG)].
Also you need to check for NULL return.
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-04 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-04 4:39 [PATCH 1/2] cpqfc: fix for "Using too much stach" in 2.6 kernel Saripalli, Venkata Ramanamurthy (STSD)
2005-08-04 4:49 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 9:38 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 12:13 ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2005-08-04 15:40 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 15:56 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 16:42 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 17:11 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2005-08-04 17:38 ` Dave Jones
2005-08-04 13:53 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-08-06 1:13 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508041513.51692.vda@ilport.com.ua \
--to=vda@ilport.com.ua \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=eike-kernel@sf-tec.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saripalli@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox