From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262478AbVHDSQy (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:16:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262499AbVHDSQy (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:16:54 -0400 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:60865 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262478AbVHDSQx (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 14:16:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:20:16 -0700 From: Grant Grundler To: Roland Dreier Cc: openib-general@openib.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [openib-general] [RFC] Move InfiniBand .h files Message-ID: <20050804182016.GE20422@esmail.cup.hp.com> References: <52iryla9r5.fsf@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52iryla9r5.fsf@cisco.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 10:32:14AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: ... I agree with the rename/relocation of the header files for the reasons you mentioned. > - It makes it a little harder to pull the OpenIB svn tree into a > kernel tree, since one would have to link both drivers/infiniband > and include/linux/rdma instead of just drivers/infiniband. This > problem goes away if/when OpenIB shifts over to a new source code > control system. Any thoughts on renaming drivers/infiniband to drivers/rdma at the same time? If you are going to churn...don't be shy about it :^) grant