From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:38:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050804203831.GD4029@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050804065447.GB25606@lug-owl.de>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:54:47AM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>...
> Current GCC from CVS (plus minor configury patches) seems to work. We
> had -fno-unit-at-a-time missing in our arch Makefile which hides a bug
> in kernel's sources.
>
> I guess that if you remove -fno-unit-at-a-time from i386 and use a
> current GCC, you'll run into that fun, too.
What bug exactly?
I'm sometimes using kernels compiled with gcc 4.0 and without
-fno-unit-at-a-time and except for the kernel image being smaller I
haven't noticed any difference. Besides this, all architectures except
i386 and um are not disabling unit-at-a-time.
There are a few parts of the kernel that might still have stack problems
with unit-at-a-time, but I assume that's not what you are talking about?
> MfG, JBG
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-04 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-31 22:26 [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2 Adrian Bunk
2005-07-31 22:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-31 23:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-08-07 16:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-08-10 19:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-11 0:02 ` Joe
2005-08-11 0:05 ` David S. Miller
2005-08-13 3:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-08-01 3:01 ` [2.6 patch] " Kurt Wall
2005-08-02 5:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-08-01 4:27 ` Miles Bader
2005-08-02 21:46 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-03 2:08 ` Gustavo Guillermo Pérez
2005-08-04 0:53 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2005-08-04 20:34 ` networking problems when using gcc 4.0.1 Adrian Bunk
2005-08-04 1:34 ` [2.6 patch] remove support for gcc < 3.2 Dave Airlie
2005-08-04 6:54 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-04 20:38 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-08-05 21:14 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-05 21:30 ` Martin Drab
2005-08-05 21:37 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-13 9:21 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2005-08-12 7:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-08-12 10:40 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-08-12 12:29 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050804203831.GD4029@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox