From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gabriel Devenyi <ace@staticwave.ca>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org, Jake Moilanen <moilanen@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Interbench 0.27
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:04:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508042204.57977.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F2047A.1050906@staticwave.ca>
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:05, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I have to think about it. This seems a problem only on one type of cpu
> > for some strange reason (lemme guess; athlon?) and indeed leaving out the
> > sleep 1 followed by the check made results far less reliable. This way
> > with the sleep 1 I have not had spurious results returned by the
> > calibration. I'm open to suggestions if anyone's got one.
>
> Yeah, thats right, it spins forever on both my athlon-tbird and my
> athlon64 (in x86_64 mode). I'll take another look at the code tonight,
> to see if I can figure out why its causing this, or another way of
> incurring the delay you're looking for.
I'd appreciate it. It's almost like some power stepping that's responsible.
I've never seen it happen on any intel processor (including the pentiumM ones
which have truckloads of power saving features). I've asked many people if
they're running some equivalent of cool'n'quiet or powernow* and they all
insist they're not... I'm not that familiar with all the powersaving techs
though.
Cheers,
Con
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-04 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-03 7:58 [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.26 Con Kolivas
2005-08-03 12:01 ` [ck] " Gabriel Devenyi
2005-08-03 12:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-03 23:25 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-03 23:25 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-03 23:34 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-04 0:04 ` [ANNOUNCE] Interbench 0.27 Con Kolivas
2005-08-04 11:44 ` [ck] " Gabriel Devenyi
2005-08-04 11:46 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-04 12:05 ` Gabriel Devenyi
2005-08-04 12:04 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-04 12:19 ` Gabriel Devenyi
2005-08-06 3:37 ` Gabriel Devenyi
2005-08-06 4:59 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-10 20:45 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508042204.57977.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=ace@staticwave.ca \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moilanen@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox