From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tony@atomide.com, tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com
Subject: [PATCH] dyn-tick3 tweaks respin
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:20:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200508051320.40034.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508051139.25024.kernel@kolivas.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 465 bytes --]
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:39 am, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:53 am, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > All else being equal, it is much better if you unlock in the
> > same function that takes the lock. For readability.
> >
> > It looks like you should be able to leave all the flow control
> > and locking the same, and use update_monotonic_base() to
> > do the actual update?
>
> Good advice, thanks. Will respin.
Like this I assume you meant?
Cheers,
Con
---
[-- Attachment #2: dtck3-tweaks.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2470 bytes --]
Index: linux-2.6.13-rc5-ck2/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13-rc5-ck2.orig/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c 2005-08-03 11:29:29.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc5-ck2/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c 2005-08-05 13:15:23.000000000 +1000
@@ -167,10 +167,19 @@ static void delay_tsc(unsigned long loop
} while ((now-bclock) < loops);
}
+/* update the monotonic base value */
+static inline void update_monotonic_base(unsigned long long last_offset)
+{
+ unsigned long long this_offset;
+
+ this_offset = ((unsigned long long)last_tsc_high << 32) | last_tsc_low;
+ monotonic_base += cycles_2_ns(this_offset - last_offset);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HPET_TIMER
static void mark_offset_tsc_hpet(void)
{
- unsigned long long this_offset, last_offset;
+ unsigned long long last_offset;
unsigned long offset, temp, hpet_current;
write_seqlock(&monotonic_lock);
@@ -198,9 +207,7 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc_hpet(void)
}
hpet_last = hpet_current;
- /* update the monotonic base value */
- this_offset = ((unsigned long long)last_tsc_high<<32)|last_tsc_low;
- monotonic_base += cycles_2_ns(this_offset - last_offset);
+ update_monotonic_base(last_offset);
write_sequnlock(&monotonic_lock);
/* calculate delay_at_last_interrupt */
@@ -347,7 +354,7 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc(void)
int count;
int countmp;
static int count1 = 0;
- unsigned long long this_offset, last_offset;
+ unsigned long long last_offset;
static int lost_count = 0;
write_seqlock(&monotonic_lock);
@@ -368,8 +375,11 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc(void)
rdtsc(last_tsc_low, last_tsc_high);
- if (dyn_tick_enabled())
- goto monotonic_base;
+ if (dyn_tick_enabled()) {
+ update_monotonic_base(last_offset);
+ write_sequnlock(&monotonic_lock);
+ return;
+ }
spin_lock(&i8253_lock);
outb_p(0x00, PIT_MODE); /* latch the count ASAP */
@@ -439,16 +449,9 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc(void)
} else
lost_count = 0;
- monotonic_base:
-
- /* update the monotonic base value */
- this_offset = ((unsigned long long)last_tsc_high<<32)|last_tsc_low;
- monotonic_base += cycles_2_ns(this_offset - last_offset);
+ update_monotonic_base(last_offset);
write_sequnlock(&monotonic_lock);
- if (dyn_tick_enabled())
- return;
-
/* calculate delay_at_last_interrupt */
count = ((LATCH-1) - count) * TICK_SIZE;
delay_at_last_interrupt = (count + LATCH/2) / LATCH;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-05 3:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-02 12:25 [PATCH] no-idle-hz aka dynamic ticks Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 12:58 ` Prakash Punnoor
2005-08-02 13:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-02 13:28 ` [PATCH] no-idle-hz aka dynamic ticks-2 Con Kolivas
2005-08-03 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-05 0:02 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-05 0:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-05 0:23 ` [PATCH] dyn-tick3 tweaks Con Kolivas
2005-08-05 0:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-05 1:39 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-05 3:20 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2005-08-05 3:32 ` [PATCH] dyn-tick3 tweaks respin Nick Piggin
2005-08-03 21:12 ` [PATCH] no-idle-hz aka dynamic ticks-2 Pavel Machek
2005-08-04 21:20 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-03 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-03 7:59 ` [PATCH] no-idle-hz aka dynamic ticks Russell King
2005-08-03 9:06 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200508051320.40034.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox