public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: John B?ckstrand <sandos@home.se>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:12:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805201215.GG7425@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73ek987gjw.fsf@bragg.suse.de>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 01:45:55PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> John B?ckstrand <sandos@home.se> writes:
> 
> > I've been trying to hunt down a hard lockup issue with some hardware
> > of mine, but I've possibly hit a kernel bug instead. When using
> > netconsole on my e1000, if I unplug the cable and then re-plug it, the
> > machine locks up hard. It manages to print the "link up" message on
> > the screen, but nothing after that. Now, I wonder if this is supposed
> > to be so? I tried this on 4 different configurations, 2.6.13-rc5 and
> > 2.6.12 with and without "noapic acpi=off", same result on all of
> > them. I've tried with 1 and 3 other NICs in the machine at the same
> > time.
> 
> I ran into the same problem some time ago on e1000. The problem was
> that if the link doesn't come up netconsole ends up waiting forever
> for it.

I still don't like this fix. Yes, you're right, it should eventually
give up. But here it gives up way too easily - 5 could easily
translate to 5 microseconds. This is analogous to giving up on serial
transmit if CTS is down for 5 loops.

I'd be much happier if there were some udelay or the like in here so
that we're not giving up on such a short timeframe.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42F347D2.7000207@home.se.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-08-05 11:45 ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 12:44   ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-05 13:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 13:55     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:14         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 14:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:36             ` David S. Miller
2005-08-05 15:02               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 14:36           ` [PATCH] netpoll can lock up on low memory Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:01             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 20:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 21:28                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:23                   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  1:53                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  2:32                       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:30                         ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-06  7:58                         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 23:10                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  9:46                         ` David S. Miller
2005-08-06  9:57                           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06 12:09                             ` John Bäckstrand
2005-08-07  5:40                             ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:26               ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 21:42                 ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 21:51                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:16                     ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  0:30                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-06  7:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-08-06 11:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-07 21:12     ` lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media insertion John Bäckstrand
2005-08-08  2:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-08-05 20:12   ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2005-08-05 21:56     ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-05 23:20       ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-05 23:51         ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-06  1:22           ` Matt Mackall
2005-08-06  1:37             ` Daniel Phillips
2005-08-05 11:04 John Bäckstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050805201215.GG7425@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandos@home.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox