From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752777AbVHGVYe (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:24:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752778AbVHGVYe (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:24:34 -0400 Received: from hockin.org ([66.35.79.110]:30168 "EHLO www.hockin.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752777AbVHGVYd (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:24:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:24:25 -0700 From: Tim Hockin To: Lee Revell Cc: Andi Kleen , Erick Turnquist , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Lost Ticks on x86_64 Message-ID: <20050807212425.GA7926@hockin.org> References: <5348b8ba050806204453392f7f@mail.gmail.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1123440679.12766.5.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1123440679.12766.5.camel@mindpipe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:51:19PM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > > It's most likely bad SMM code in the BIOS that blocks the CPU too long > > and is triggered in idle. You can verify that by using idle=poll > > (not recommended for production, just for testing) and see if it goes away. > > > > WTF, since when do *desktops* use SMM? Are you telling me that we have > to worry about these stupid ACPI/SMM hardware bugs on the desktop too? SMM is how BIOSes do legacy support (which stops at OS-handover). It's also how some BIOSes do ECC reporting and logging. We just do pci tweaks to turn it off in the OS.