From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753226AbVHHBrT (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:47:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753230AbVHHBrS (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:47:18 -0400 Received: from mail.tor.primus.ca ([216.254.136.21]:17043 "EHLO smtp-05.primus.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753226AbVHHBrS (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:47:18 -0400 From: Gabriel Devenyi To: ck@vds.kolivas.org Subject: Re: [ck] Re: [PATCH] i386 No-Idle-Hz aka Dynamic-Ticks 5 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:45:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Con Kolivas , Kyle Moffett , Andrew Morton , vatsa@in.ibm.com, tony@atomide.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk , tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, george@mvista.com References: <200508031559.24704.kernel@kolivas.org> <200508081130.23636.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200508081130.23636.kernel@kolivas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508072145.22203.ace@staticwave.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Along the same lines, is there an x86_64 patch around? On August 07, 2005 21:30, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:20 am, Kyle Moffett wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2005, at 19:51:25, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:58, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > >> Con, > > >> I am afraid until SMP correctness is resolved, then this is not > > >> in a position to go in (unless you want to enable it only for UP, > > >> which > > >> I think should not be our target). I am working on making this work > > >> correctly on SMP systems. Hopefully I will post a patch soon. > > > > > > Great! I wasn't sure what time frame you meant when you last > > > posted. I won't > > > do anything more, leaving this patch as it is, and pass the baton > > > to you. > > > > I'm curious what has happened to the PPC side of the patch. IIRC, > > someone > > was working on such a port, but it seems to have been lost along the way > > at some point. Is there any additional information on that patch? > > Tony said he had it lying around somewhere and needed to find time to dust > it off and get it up to speed. > > Cheers, > Con > _______________________________________________ > ck@vds.kolivas.org > ck mailing list. Please reply-to-all when posting. > If replying to an email please reply below the original message. > http://bhhdoa.org.au/mailman/listinfo/ck -- Gabriel Devenyi ace@staticwave.ca